API Gateway in ASP.NET Core Web API Microservices

Back to: Microservices using ASP.NET Core Web API Tutorials

API Gateway in ASP.NET Core Web API Microservices

Modern software systems are rapidly moving away from Monolithic Architectures toward Microservices-Based Architectures, where an application is composed of many Small, Independent, and Deployable Services. This approach brings tremendous advantages in terms of Scalability, Modularity, and Flexibility, but it also introduces new challenges in Communication, Routing, and Service Management.

In a Microservices Ecosystem, dozens of services may run across Different Servers, Containers, or Cloud Environments. Each service can start, stop, or Scale Independently, causing its network location (IP or port) to change frequently. Managing direct communication between clients and these dynamic services becomes complex, error-prone, and inefficient.

As the number of services grows, ensuring that each service can find and communicate with others securely and efficiently becomes increasingly complex. This is where API Gateways and Service Discovery Mechanisms come into play.

• The API Gateway acts as the Single-Entry Point for all Client Requests, handling Routing, Load Balancing, Authentication, Rate Limiting, Logging, Caching, and Aggregation between external clients and internal microservices.
• Service Discovery, on the other hand, ensures that services can find and Communicate With Each Other Dynamically, without hardcoded addresses or manual configurations. This enables seamless internal communication even as services scale up, restart, or relocate.

Together, these two components form the Communication Backbone of any modern ASP.NET Core Web API microservices system, providing a unified, secure, and dynamic way to connect services and deliver reliable performance in distributed environments.

What is an API Gateway?

An API Gateway is the Single-Entry Point for all client requests in a Microservices-Based System.
Instead of allowing clients (such as web or mobile apps or partner systems) to communicate directly with multiple backend services, all requests are routed through the API Gateway.

The API Gateway acts as an Intelligent Reverse Proxy. It receives incoming client requests, identifies which microservice(s) should handle them, routes them accordingly, and then aggregates and returns the combined response to the client.

So, the API Gateway serves as the Communication Bridge between Clients and the Distributed Microservices, ensuring Security, Scalability, and Operational Efficiency in a modern ASP.NET Core Web API microservices architecture.

Real-Time Analogy – The Reception Desk of a Smart Organization

• When you enter a large corporate office, you don’t walk around looking for HR, Finance, or IT. You go to the Reception Desk.
• The receptionist verifies your ID (authentication), assesses your purpose, and directs you to the appropriate department (routing).
• The API Gateway plays that same role, the single smart point that manages every visitor (client request) entering the organization (system).

Why API Gateway Matters in Microservices

In a microservices architecture, clients often need to interact with multiple independent services such as OrderService, ProductService, and PaymentService. Without an API Gateway, each client would need to know the location, version, and security details of every service, resulting in complex, tightly coupled communication.

The API Gateway solves these challenges by acting as a Single, Intelligent Front Door to the entire microservices system. It hides the internal complexity of the underlying services and provides a unified interface for all client interactions. The following are the Key Reasons Why an API gateway is essential.

Smart Routing

The core responsibility of an API Gateway is to Route Incoming Client Requests to the correct backend microservice. This routing ensures that requests reach the right service without clients needing to know internal service details. It supports various routing techniques, such as:

• Path-Based Routing: Routes requests based on the URL path. Example: /api/products → ProductService.
• Header-Based or Method-Based Routing: Routes requests depending on HTTP headers or methods (GET, POST). Used for more dynamic or conditional routing rules.
• Version-Based Routing: Directs traffic to different API versions, such as/v1/orders or /v2/orders. Useful for backward compatibility when rolling out new features.
• Blue-Green or Canary Routing: Gradually sends a small portion of traffic to a new version while the old version continues to run. Minimizes risk during deployments.

This flexibility allows you to evolve services independently, roll out new versions safely, and manage traffic efficiently without breaking client integrations.

Real-Time Analogy: Postal Sorting Center

Think of a postal sorting center. Every letter (client request) arrives at a single hub (API Gateway).

• The postal sorter looks at the address (URL path) and decides which city (microservice) it should go to.
• Sometimes, letters are stamped “priority” or “registered” (header-based routing).
• Old and new zip codes (API versions) may coexist during transitions.

This sorting-center logic ensures every parcel reaches the right destination without the sender knowing the complex internal routes.

Aggregation and Composition

Modern applications often need to fetch data from Multiple Microservices to serve a single client request. The API Gateway can aggregate or combine those responses into one unified payload. This process reduces multiple network calls into one, improving client performance and user experience.

Example:
A “Customer Dashboard” endpoint in the Gateway might:

• Fetch User Details from UserService
• Fetch Recent Orders from OrderService
• Fetch Payment Status from PaymentService

Then combine them into a single JSON response, returning everything to the client in a single API call. This approach improves performance, reduces server load, and simplifies client-side logic. The client gets all necessary data with a single API call.

Real-Time Analogy – Restaurant Waiter and Kitchen Staff

Instead of ordering dal, sabzi, roti, raita, and dessert one by one, you get a thali: one plate with everything composed for you. The gateway’s “dashboard” endpoints do the same: one request collects User + Orders + Payments from multiple kitchens (services) and serves a single dish (unified JSON).

Authentication and Authorization

The API Gateway acts as the Security Gatekeeper of your microservices ecosystem. It ensures that only Valid, Authenticated, and Authorized users can access backend services. It validates JWT tokens, OAuth2 Credentials, or API keys, enforces Role-Based Access Controls (RBAC).

• JWT Tokens (JSON Web Tokens): Secure, digitally signed tokens that verify user identity and claims before requests reach backend services.
• OAuth2 Credentials: A Standard authorization framework that allows third-party apps to access user data securely without sharing passwords.
• API Keys: Unique identifiers issued to each client or service to validate legitimate API usage.
• Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Restricts access based on assigned user roles (e.g., Admin, Manager, User), ensuring each user can only perform authorized actions.

By validating these credentials at the Gateway, every request entering the system is already verified and secure. This centralized validation ensures consistent security enforcement and eliminates the need for each microservice to handle authentication logic independently.

Real-Time Analogy – Nightclub Bouncer with Different Access Levels

The API Gateway is the Security Gatekeeper, validating credentials before requests reach internal services.

• JWT Token → Digital Stamp: Proves you’ve paid and can enter.
• OAuth2 → VIP Pass: Allows partner apps to enter on your behalf without sharing your password.
• API Key → Guest Pass: Identifies which guest (app) is inside.
• RBAC → Access Zones: Only managers can enter the VIP room (Admin area).

Just like the bouncer checks IDs and passes before letting people in, the Gateway verifies every request to keep the system safe.

Rate Limiting and Throttling

To prevent overuse or malicious attacks, the API Gateway Controls How Many Requests (Rate Limiting and Throttling) each user or service can make within a defined time frame.

Why:

• Abuse: When a user or script repeatedly calls an API unnecessarily (intentional or accidental) to exploit resources.
• Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks: Flooding the API with requests to make it unavailable or slow down for real users.
• Sudden Traffic Spikes: Unexpected surges in legitimate traffic, e.g., during a flash sale or app launches.

Control Types:

• Rate Limits: Define the number of requests allowed per time window (e.g., 100 requests per minute).
• Quotas: Define total usage over longer periods (e.g., 10,000 requests per day).

Scoping Options:

• Per Client: Limits applied to individual user or application.
• Per Route: Limits applied to specific endpoints (e.g., /api/orders).

By enforcing these controls, the API Gateway ensures fair usage, prevents downtime, and protects backend resources from overload.

Real-Time Analogy – Highway toll gate.

• Too many cars (requests) entering at once could jam the highway (backend).
• Toll booths (rate limiters) control how many cars pass per minute.
• VIP lanes (per client) or special routes (per endpoint) get custom limits.
• Daily traffic quotas ensure long-term balance.

This keeps traffic flowing smoothly and prevents reckless drivers (abusers) from blocking others.

Load Balancing

Load Balancing enables the API Gateway to distribute incoming traffic evenly across multiple service instances, enhancing performance and preventing overloading any single instance. It also performs Health Checks to ensure requests are sent only to healthy instances, improving availability and reliability

It uses any of the following algorithms to distribute the traffic.

• Round-Robin: Sequentially routes each new request to the next instance in the list, simple and fair.
• Least-Connections: Sends requests to the instance with the fewest active connections — great for uneven workloads.
• Hash-Based Routing: Uses consistent hashing (e.g., by user ID, client ID, or IP) to ensure requests from the same client always reach the same instance.

This ensures High Availability, Fault Tolerance, and Optimal Resource Utilization across distributed microservices.

Real-Time Analogy – Call-Center Queue Manager

When callers dial support, an IVR directs them to the next available agent, often the least busy, or pins VIPs to a dedicated desk. The gateway uses round-robin, least-connections, or hash-based policies to evenly distribute calls and ensure they are always sent to healthy agents (instances).

Caching and Compression

To improve speed and reduce backend workload, the API Gateway can store (cache) responses and compress them before sending them to the client. It supports features such as Per-Route Caching, ETags, Conditional Requests, and GZIP/Brotli Compression, enabling faster response times and better network efficiency

• Per-Route Caching: Applies caching rules on specific routes (e.g., cache /api/products but not /api/orders).
• ETags (Entity Tags): Entity tags (Identifiers) used to validate whether cached data is still fresh or needs updating.
• Conditional Requests: Allow clients to use cached data only if it’s still valid, reducing unnecessary network traffic. That means it allows the client to fetch data only if it has changed since the last request.
• GZIP/Brotli Compression: Compresses response payloads before transmission to minimize bandwidth and improve load time.

Caching temporarily stores frequently requested data so repeated requests can be served quickly without hitting the backend each time. It reduces server load and improves response time, while compression ensures faster data delivery over slower networks.

Real-Time Analogy – Library Librarian and Photocopier

A librarian (API Gateway) keeps popular books (cached responses) on the front desk for quick access instead of fetching from storage every time.

Request and Response Transformation

The API Gateway can modify both Incoming Requests and Outgoing Responses to ensure compatibility between clients and backend services.

Examples of Transformations:

• Changing or renaming headers and parameters.
• Rewriting URLs to match updated service endpoints.
• Renaming JSON fields or restructuring objects.
• Adjusting responses for different device types (web, mobile, IoT).

Transformation decouples clients from backend changes, allowing services to evolve without breaking client applications.

Real-Time Analogy – Language Translator at a Conference

• Speakers (microservices) may use different languages; the translator (API Gateway) converts messages so the audience (clients) can understand them clearly.
• Even if a speaker changes their vocabulary (e.g., a version upgrade), the translator adjusts accordingly without interrupting the conversation.

Observability and Monitoring (Logging)

The API Gateway serves as the central observation point for Monitoring Traffic, Performance, and System Health. These capabilities help teams detect issues early, understand dependencies, and maintain a high level of service reliability.

Core Observability Elements:

• Logs: Capture request and response details for debugging and auditing.
• Traces: Track a request’s journey across multiple services to identify bottlenecks.
• Correlation IDs: Unique identifiers added to each request to connect related logs and traces.

Real-Time Analogy – Air Traffic Control Radar

• Every plane (request) entering the airspace is monitored with radar (logs and metrics). The controller assigns each a unique flight number (correlation ID) to track its entire journey (trace).
• If one plane delays, the tower (API Gateway) instantly spots and reschedules others to avoid collisions (downtime).

Popular API Gateway Implementations in the ASP.NET Core Ecosystem

In the ASP.NET Core ecosystem, several API Gateway Solutions help manage routing, security, load balancing, and service aggregation between clients and microservices. Each tool varies in flexibility, performance, and integration depth, allowing architects to choose the one that best fits their system’s scale and requirements. The following are the most popular API Gateway implementations used in real-world .NET microservices deployments:

Ocelot – Lightweight and .NET-Native Gateway

Ocelot is an Open-Source, Community-Driven API Gateway designed specifically for .NET Core. It’s lightweight, easy to configure, and ideal for Small to Medium-Sized Microservice Systems.

Key Highlights:

• Written entirely in .NET and runs cross-platform.
• Uses a simple JSON-based configuration file (ocelot.json).
• Supports Routing, Authentication, Rate Limiting, Load Balancing, Caching, QoS Policies, And Request Aggregation.
• Integrates with Consul, Eureka, and IdentityServer for Service Discovery and security.
• Excellent choice for developers building native ASP.NET Core microservice solutions.

Best For: Projects that need a Lightweight, Self-Hosted, and .NET-Friendly gateway with minimal setup.

YARP (Yet Another Reverse Proxy) – Microsoft’s High-Performance Gateway

Developed and maintained by Microsoft, YARP is a Modern, High-Performance Reverse Proxy Library built on top of the ASP.NET Core middleware pipeline. It’s highly extensible, giving developers full control over Routing, Policies, and Performance Tuning.

Key Highlights:

• Deep integration with the ASP.NET Core hosting and middleware model.
• Supports Dynamic Configuration Reloads, Hot Routing Updates, and Custom Load-Balancing Strategies.
• Ideal for scenarios where developers need to embed proxy logic directly within existing ASP.NET Core applications.
• Designed for High Throughput, Low Latency, and full control over request pipelines.

Best For: Large-scale or performance-sensitive systems that require Tight Integration with ASP.NET Core and advanced customization through C# code.

Kong Gateway – Enterprise-Grade, Platform-Agnostic Solution

Kong is a Language-Agnostic, Open-Source API Gateway built on top of NGINX and written in Lua. It’s widely adopted in enterprise environments for managing high-traffic, complex microservice ecosystems.

Key Highlights:

• Rich Plugin Ecosystem for authentication, analytics, rate limiting, and observability.
• Supports Service Mesh Integrations, gRPC, and Multi-Protocol Routing.
• Offers both Open-Source and Enterprise Editions with advanced dashboards and security policies.
• Runs independently of .NET but integrates smoothly with ASP.NET Core microservices via REST or gRPC endpoints.

Best For: Enterprises that require Multi-Language Interoperability, Plugin-Driven Extensibility, and Production-Grade Scalability.

Other Commonly Used Gateways in .NET Environments

While Ocelot, YARP, and Kong are the most popular in the .NET ecosystem, developers also use other tools based on their deployment and scalability needs:

• NGINX / Envoy / Traefik: Popular for containerized and Kubernetes-based deployments; provide robust load balancing and observability.
• Azure API Management / AWS API Gateway / Apigee: Managed cloud gateways offering global scalability, enterprise policies, and integrated developer portals.

These are preferred when teams want cloud-managed solutions, multi-region routing, or enterprise-level governance.

Real-Time Analogy: Selecting the Right Gateway Is Like Choosing the Right Highway Entry Point

Imagine multiple routes leading into a city (your microservices ecosystem).

• Ocelot is like a simple, efficient toll gate for small towns, easy to manage and quick to set up.
• YARP is a modern, smart highway junction built for heavy traffic, flexible, and fully integrated with local control systems.
• Kong is the global expressway hub, supporting international lanes, multiple toll systems, and enterprise-level coordination.

Choosing the right gateway ensures your “traffic”, client requests, move smoothly, securely, and efficiently into your microservices world.

Do All Microservices Need a Separate Domain?

No, every microservice does not need its own public domain.

• In most production setups, Microservices Are Internal Services. They live behind the API Gateway and are not exposed directly to the internet.
• The API Gateway exposes a Single Public Entry Point (Domain), and it internally routes requests to different microservices.

Example:

Client → https://api.mycompany.com (public)

↓

├── ProductService → https://products-service:5001

├── OrderService → https://orders-service:5002

└── PaymentService → https://payments-service:5003

Here, all internal microservices have Private Internal URLs (or container DNS names), not public domains.

What Are Private Internal URLs?

Private Internal URLs refer to Network Addresses (URLs) used for communication between internal components of a system, such as microservices, databases, or backend systems, that are not exposed to the public internet. These URLs are only accessible within a Private Network, such as:

• A local development machine (e.g., http://localhost:5001)
• A company’s intranet (e.g., http://orderservice.internal.local)
• A cloud VPC or container orchestrator network (e.g., http://productservice.default.svc.cluster.local in Kubernetes)

Key Characteristics

• They exist only inside the internal network (e.g., http://orderservice:5002 or http://10.0.1.5:5002).
• They are not exposed via DNS to the public internet.
• They are used by the API Gateway or other services for internal communication only.
• They don’t have SSL certificates or public IPs, because security and SSL are handled at the API Gateway layer.
• Usually, microservices talk to each other via these internal addresses, not via domain names.

Does the API Gateway Need Its Own Domain?

Yes. The API Gateway should have one main public domain. The API Gateway domain acts as the Front Door for your entire system.

For example:

• https://api.mycompany.com

Behind the scenes:

• /products → ProductService
• /orders → OrderService
• /payments → PaymentService

All traffic flows through this domain. It’s where you:

• Apply SSL/TLS certificates
• Enforce authentication/authorization
• Implement rate limiting, caching, and request logging
• Monitor and trace all requests centrally

Real-Time Analogy – Private Extension Numbers in an Office

Think of your microservices like employees in a company:

• Each employee has a Private Extension Number (e.g., 101 or 102), accessible only within the office network.
• Outsiders can’t call extensions directly; they dial the Main Company Number and ask the Receptionist (API Gateway) to connect them.

Similarly:

• Each microservice has a Private Internal URL.
• External clients connect via the Main Domain (API Gateway).
• The Gateway forwards requests internally using those private URLs.

In short, Private Internal URLs are non-public addresses used by microservices to communicate within a secure internal network, and the API Gateway is the only component that exposes a public domain to the outside world.